be useful
How Can Web Tech Help Enterprises with Innovation Management?
The times are changing and I’m a firm believer in the idea that technology plays a (largely) positive role in this.
ReadWriteWeb agrees with me:
The innovator’s dilemma, according to Christensen, affects companies whose success and capabilities can actually become obstacles in the face of changing markets and technologies. There is no more important an issue on the agenda of top management than driving innovation. In this post, we’ll review the evolution of “innovation management” and how social media has a significant role to play. This is one area where social media can “move the needle” for large enterprises and help them change the very nature of the firm.
Of course, with the economy as it is, only time will tell.
Posted via email from Be Useful | Comment »
Text posted at 05:47
I Don't Believe In Originality
For example, I’ve been trying to find the words to connect the misunderstood world of rap/hip-hop to what it truly is at it’s most basic form: poetry. I found a blog post by Hitchcock Blonde that accurately paints the picture (IMO):
Poetry was invented to be conjured on the tongue. All those nomadic bards, minstrels, skalds, rhapsodes, udgatars, griots, ashiks, ozans and dengbejs moulded it into a perfect conduit and cradle for cultural and social memory. On the page, like Shakespeare’s plays, poetry has a sterile beauty; but remembered and performed, it has visceral, affecting life…As any actor will attest, to properly remember something you have to understand it. Parrot by rote, and your brain can’t connect the chain. Find the throughline, the backbone - even if it is purely rythmic, aural or instinctive - and it sticks. Allusive, intellectual and contextual richness will come; but sensing the emotional and aesthetic shape of a poem deep in your bones is the most important and often neglected way to it’s heart.
That also explains why I like talking about Tribes, Flobots, Words that Work and whatever else it is that someone does that I’m unable to.
I’m not a good writer and it feels good to finally be admit that.
Posted via email from Be Useful | Comment »
Text posted at 02:40
NPR's Best Album's of 2008
Text posted at 04:05
The Power of Not Talking
I read a book a few months ago, Words That Work: It’s Not What You Say, It’s What People Hear by Frank Luntz. Apart from the fact that he loves how much everyone hates him, it’s made me more aware of words and how important they are in communicating ideas, problems, concepts. Whatever.
Another excellent example would be the Tower of Babel. There are very many different versions of the story (my favorite is Jonathan Davis’ reading in the audio version of Neal Stephenson’s novel Snow Crash). I haven’t picked up much else (yet) from the book so please don’t take this as a recommendation.
In stark contrast to all that endless talking, there’s The Power of Words from the Guardian:
The Pirahã have no socially lubricating “hello” and “thank you” and “sorry”. They have no words for colours, no words for numbers and no way of expressing any history beyond that experienced in their lifetimes. And, in the late 70s, Everett was dispatched to the Amazon to learn their language, translate the Bible and convert them to Christianity.I had a feeling there were a lot of stories hidden in that short paragraph. And it turns out I was right.
For example:
Thirty years of living with the Pirahã has taught Everett that they exist almost completely in the present. Absorbed by the daily struggle to survive, they do not plan ahead, store food, build houses or canoes to last, maintain tools or talk of things beyond those that they, or people they know, have experienced. They are the “ultimate empiricists”, he argues, and this culture of living in the present has shaped their language.
And then there’s:
Yet Everett’s life with the Pirahã didn’t just cause a gradual disenchantment with the Chomskyan intellectual framework he had once cherished: it also triggered another, even more dramatic, de-conversion.All of that to say: I’m going to try to read this book before I die and you should’ve been reading that article a long time ago agreeing with me.
Text posted at 01:35
My Poor (wannabe) Blog
I swear I’m lurking around here somewhere (twitter’s where all my actions been happening lately).
There’s some other stuff cooking too.
LIke Calgoo, “the best calender service in the world”, until I ran into 30boxes and now I have to get them to duke it out.
Text posted at 19:06
Analyzing the Election
USA Today has a cool tool for analyzing the results of the election. This is your chance to fold & unfold every delicious (or bitter) moment of Nov 4th by geographic location, wallet size, number of gray hair, or whatever else the infornographic mind desires.
Text posted at 11:59
Journalists & Tech | Food for the Start-up Mind
It’s been frustrating to see journalism fight technology and I’ve always thought that most journalists didn’t care too much about it. This morning I ran into two blog posts that confirm just how wrong I’ve been:The first was Amy Graham’s post Working With Journalists: What’s in it for Geeks?:
This discussion got me thinking: Right now, it’s becoming obvious to many journalists that our field sorely needs lots of top-notch, creative technologists. Developers for whom software is a medium, and an art form. Developers with a deep passion for information, credibility, fairness, usefulness, and free speech.
Which linked to Richard Gordon’s by Journalists & Technologists: An Uneasy Courtship recounting his experience at the recently held Computation + Journalism Symposium:
Still, by the end of the first day, I was a bit frustrated. We’d heard journalists talk about their uses of technology, and we’d heard computer scientists talk about technologies relevant to journalism. But it was uncommon for anyone to try to connect the two. I was ready to mix it up, to argue, to move on to talking about new ideas and solutions to the problems journalists and media companies are facing. But we never seemed to get there.
Upon reflection, I realized: This was like a first date. You know the feeling. You talk mostly about what you do. You ask a few questions. You’re very careful not to get spaghetti sauce on your tie. But you’re so careful about making a good impression that you don’t really delve very deep. You and the person across the table are ultra-polite, but you don’t really understand each other. If you like the other person, you’re hoping to keep the door open to a second date. If you don’t, you’re hoping to find a graceful way to avoid hurting your companion’s feelings.
I stand corrected.
On a slightly different note, my new favorite online news site SocialMedian, recently came out with an election tracking widget (I wrote a little about it in this post I wrote for the company blog). And if you’re looking for election coverage with a tech twist, Jason Goldberg, the founder, will also be covering the election with Leo Laporte live on This Week in Tech on Tuesday, Nov 4 @ 8 pm EST/ 5 pm PST. If that still doesn’t do it for you, see Mashable’s The Ultimate Election Day 2008 Toolkit.
In the spirit of democracy and freedom, go out and rock that vote!
Or not. Either way it’s up to you.
Text posted at 11:44
World Wide Words: Other sites of interest
I’ve been coming across a lot of word related websites and I’m loving it:
Worldwide words has a nice list of word related websites.
I like Buzz Whack, the Language Log and Lake Superior University’s Banished Word’s List. Word Origins is cool too.
FWIW, I got on this word trip after picking up Frank Luntz’s Words That Work: It’s Not What You Say But What People Hear. It’s worth a read at the very least because it shows how important the words we use really are.
Text posted at 22:07
Why Open Source?
I read an article in BusinessWeek on Google’s Android that’s been irking me since I read it. Now I think know why.As someone who appreciates good ideas, I’m a fan of both Apple & Google. I’m also a beta testing addict who knows nothing about code so the idea of buggy software that’s usable by ordinary people makes me as giddy as a 6 year old running after the ice cream truck.
The thing that bothers me is what’s supposed to be the difference between the Apple and Google platforms:
The most promising thing about Android is the way Web services and search are integrated across applications. In many programs, anything you type into an open window is interpreted as a search request, tailored to whatever you are doing at that moment.
Umm….Really? That’s it?! Is that really the most promising thing about Android?!
The iPhone has flaws, too, but Apple had all the important pieces in place from Day One. Android is a work in progress. I suspect it could be a formidable competitor in six months or a year, but it has a long way to go.
Andy Rubin, who heads up Google’s Android efforts, spoke to me yesterday about his vision for the Android Market. In particular, we talked about how the market will be different from Apple’s iTunes App Store and some other efforts, which also peddle software for cell phones.
Rubin’s message: Google won’t impose many of the restrictions Apple developers have been grumbling about. Unlike iPhone aficionados, developers using Android Market will, for example, be able to allow consumers to try their applications for free before they buy them. This may seem like a small thing, but developers name lack of free trial as one of the biggest reasons behind their lukewarm App Store sales.
Text posted at 18:33
#5: I Could Die Here And No One Would Ever Know
Inc. Magazine’s Top 10 Signs You’re Ready to Leave Your Home Office (via Thought Balloons)
Text posted at 19:53
